
I think that I2P could benefit from selling itself less as a means of anonymity and more as decentralized, censorship-resistant web hosting. The unfortunate thing is that, as far as I'm aware, I2P doesn't have a "Tor Browser" of sorts, and most people would want to use I2P as a clearnet proxy the audience for I2P may always be significantly less than that of Tor even if it was revealed that Tor was totally flawed. Tor isn't necessarily flawed for that reason, but I trust less anything the US government takes an interest in.įor anyone wondering what we're talking about: Not having a history with the US military or funding from DARPA is a plus, IMO.


Yeah I hate to always be that guy, but while I think Tor is great in that it exists at all and has inspired other projects, I think I2P is an overall better design.
